Money, Banking and Financial Markets

Commentary

Commentary

 
 
Posts tagged New monetary policy tools
The Fed Goes to War: Part 2

In this note, we update our earlier comment on the first set of Fed actions that appeared on March 23 just as a slew of new ones arrived.

While most of the changes represent simple extensions of previous tools, the Fed also has introduced facilities that are going to involve it deeply in the allocation of credit to private nonfinancial firms. Choices of whom to fund are inherently political, and hence destined to be controversial. Engaging in such decisions will make it far more difficult for the Fed eventually to return to the standard of central bank independence that it has guarded for decades. We urge the Fed to limit its involvement in the allocation of credit to the private nonfinancial sector. And, should Congress deem it necessary, we encourage them to provide explicit authorization to the Treasury (along with the resources) to take on this crisis role.

Read More
Kim SchoenholtzFederal Reserve, Monetary policy, Financial stability policy, QE, Quantitative easing, New monetary policy tools, PMCCF, SMCCF, TALF, MMLF, CPFF, Large-scale asset purchases, LSAPs, LOLR, Lender of last resort, Market maker of last resort, TAF, MBS, ABS, Transparency, Accountability, Central bank independence, Exchange Stabilization Fund, ESF
The Fed Goes to War: Part 1

Over the past two weeks, the Federal Reserve has resurrected many of the policy tools that took many months to develop during the Great Financial Crisis of 2007-09 and several years to refine during the post-crisis recovery. The Fed was then learning through trial and error how to serve as an effective lender of last resort (see Tucker) and how to deploy the “new monetary policy tools” that are now part of central banks’ standard weaponry.

The good news is that the Fed’s crisis management muscles remain strong. The bad news is that the challenges of the Corona War are unprecedented. Success will require extraordinary creativity and flexibility from every part of the government. As in any war, the central bank needs to find additional ways to support the government’s efforts to steady the economy. A key challenge is to do so in a manner that allows for a smooth return to “peacetime” policy practices when the war is past.

In this post, we review the rationale for reintroducing the resurrected policy tools, distinguishing between those intended to restore market function or substitute for private intermediation, and those meant to alter financial conditions to support aggregate demand….

Read More
Steve Cecchetti and Kim SchoenholtzLender of last resort, LOLR, Expired monetary policy tools, New monetary policy tools, Coronavirus, COVID-19, Federal Reserve Act, FRA Section 13(3), Quantitative easing, QE, Targeted asset purchases, TAP, VIX, Volatility, Commercial paper, CPFF, Primary dealer, PDCF, Money market mutual fund, MMMF, MMLF, Central bank independence, Helicopter money, Fiscal dominance
Monetary Policy in the Next Recession?

In many advanced countries, lowering the policy rate to zero will be insufficient to counter the next recession. In the United States, for example, with the target range for the federal funds rate at 1½ to 1¾ percent, there is little scope for the nearly 5 percentage-point easing that is typical in recent recessions (see, for example, Kiley).

This is the setting for this year’s report for the U.S. Monetary Policy Forum, written with Michael Feroli, Anil Kashyap and Catherine Mann. Our analysis focuses on the extent to which the “new tools” of monetary policy—including quantitative easing, forward guidance and negative interest rates—have been associated with an improvement of financial conditions. The idea is that the transmission of monetary policy to economic activity and prices works primarily through its effect on a broad array of financial conditions.

The USMPF report does not challenge the views of many researchers and of most central banks that the new monetary policy (NMP) tools have an expansionary impact even at the effective lower bound for nominal interest rates (see also the 2019 report from the Committee on the Global Financial System). However, we find that these new tools generally were not sufficient to overcome the powerful headwinds that prevailed in many advanced economies over the past decade.

Our conclusion is that central bankers should clearly incorporate the new tools in their reaction functions and communications strategies, but should be humble about their likely success in countering the next recession, at least in the absence of other supportive actions (such as fiscal stimulus)….

Read More
Steve Cecchetti and Kim SchoenholtzU.S. Monetary Policy Forum, Recession, Monetary policy, New monetary policy tools, NMP tools, Unconventional monetary policy, UMP tools, Event studies, Persistence, Causality, Exogenous, Endogenous, Financial conditions, Financial conditions index, FCI, Global financial factor, Forward guidance, State-contingent forward guidance, Date-contingent forward guidance, Quantitative easing, QE, Maturity extension, Credit easing, Negative nominal interest rate, Negative policy rate